<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (9) TMI 368 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200219</link>
    <description>Parity is a relevant consideration in bail, but it is not by itself a sufficient ground for grant of bail in a second or third bail application. The accused must still be assessed on individual facts, including the nature and gravity of the offence, the role attributed, the risk of absconding, repetition, and interference with witnesses. If the applicant is truly on identical facts with a released co-accused, parity may support release, but it is not automatic. A co-accused&#039;s earlier rejection of bail does not have to be disclosed in the applicant&#039;s own bail application, because the earlier refusal does not prejudice a different accused&#039;s separate request.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 17:36:47 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514366" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (9) TMI 368 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200219</link>
      <description>Parity is a relevant consideration in bail, but it is not by itself a sufficient ground for grant of bail in a second or third bail application. The accused must still be assessed on individual facts, including the nature and gravity of the offence, the role attributed, the risk of absconding, repetition, and interference with witnesses. If the applicant is truly on identical facts with a released co-accused, parity may support release, but it is not automatic. A co-accused&#039;s earlier rejection of bail does not have to be disclosed in the applicant&#039;s own bail application, because the earlier refusal does not prejudice a different accused&#039;s separate request.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200219</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>