<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1186 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357483</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, allowed the appeals filed by the assessee-Appellants against the Order-in-Originals passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jodhpur, regarding duty liability for Henna Powder. The Tribunal relied on a government notification exempting Henna Powder and Paste from Central Excise Duty during a specified period, making the demand confirmation for that period unsustainable. As the government did not provide any classification for the goods in question, the Tribunal did not express an opinion on the classification. The impugned orders were set aside, emphasizing the importance of government notifications in determining duty liability and the need for clarity in goods classification for duty assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 16:22:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514352" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1186 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357483</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, allowed the appeals filed by the assessee-Appellants against the Order-in-Originals passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise, Jodhpur, regarding duty liability for Henna Powder. The Tribunal relied on a government notification exempting Henna Powder and Paste from Central Excise Duty during a specified period, making the demand confirmation for that period unsustainable. As the government did not provide any classification for the goods in question, the Tribunal did not express an opinion on the classification. The impugned orders were set aside, emphasizing the importance of government notifications in determining duty liability and the need for clarity in goods classification for duty assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357483</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>