<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1964 (7) TMI 48 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200214</link>
    <description>The court held that a single writ petition cannot challenge multiple assessment orders for different years or under different taxing statutes. It clarified that the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply to Article 226 proceedings, emphasizing the fixed court fee for such petitions. The court relied on precedents to support its decision, concluding that uniting multiple causes of action in one petition is not permissible in Article 226 proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 15:19:55 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514350" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1964 (7) TMI 48 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200214</link>
      <description>The court held that a single writ petition cannot challenge multiple assessment orders for different years or under different taxing statutes. It clarified that the Code of Civil Procedure does not apply to Article 226 proceedings, emphasizing the fixed court fee for such petitions. The court relied on precedents to support its decision, concluding that uniting multiple causes of action in one petition is not permissible in Article 226 proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 1964 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200214</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>