https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200194 The Supreme Court upheld the Maharashtra Judicial Service (Seniority) Rules, 2007, including the proviso to Rule 4(1). The Court affirmed the date of caderisation as 1.7.1996 and validated the protection of seniority for judicial officers appointed between 1.7.1996 and 31.3.2003. The writ petition was dismissed, concluding that the proviso was not discriminatory or illegal, and it safeguarded the legitimate expectations of those appointed during the specified period. en-us Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 12:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200194 The Supreme Court upheld the Maharashtra Judicial Service (Seniority) Rules, 2007, including the proviso to Rule 4(1). The Court affirmed the date of caderisation as 1.7.1996 and validated the protection of seniority for judicial officers appointed between 1.7.1996 and 31.3.2003. The writ petition was dismissed, concluding that the proviso was not discriminatory or illegal, and it safeguarded the legitimate expectations of those appointed during the specified period. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200194