https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200191 The statutory appellate scheme under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 was read to permit appeals from "any order," including interlocutory orders that substantially affect the parties' rights and not only final orders. Because that remedy was treated as wide and effective, the writ court declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 where an efficacious alternative statutory appeal was available. The text thus explains that the existence of such an appellate remedy can bar writ intervention even at the interlocutory stage when substantial rights are affected. en-us Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:42:32 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200191 The statutory appellate scheme under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 was read to permit appeals from "any order," including interlocutory orders that substantially affect the parties' rights and not only final orders. Because that remedy was treated as wide and effective, the writ court declined to exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 where an efficacious alternative statutory appeal was available. The text thus explains that the existence of such an appellate remedy can bar writ intervention even at the interlocutory stage when substantial rights are affected. Case-Laws Companies Law Thu, 18 Jan 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200191