https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200190 An eviction order based on a compromise in rent control proceedings is not a nullity where the statutory ground of bona fide requirement can be gathered from the record. The landlord had pleaded personal occupation, supported the claim with oral and documentary evidence, and the tenant did not cross-examine before withdrawing the defence and submitting unconditionally to eviction. On those facts, the Court treated statutory satisfaction as implicit in the proceedings and the tenant's admission, and held that an express finding in the operative order was not essential. Earlier cases invalidating compromise decrees were distinguished because no material there showed that the statutory ground had been admitted or considered. en-us Fri, 16 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 11:36:43 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200190 An eviction order based on a compromise in rent control proceedings is not a nullity where the statutory ground of bona fide requirement can be gathered from the record. The landlord had pleaded personal occupation, supported the claim with oral and documentary evidence, and the tenant did not cross-examine before withdrawing the defence and submitting unconditionally to eviction. On those facts, the Court treated statutory satisfaction as implicit in the proceedings and the tenant's admission, and held that an express finding in the operative order was not essential. Earlier cases invalidating compromise decrees were distinguished because no material there showed that the statutory ground had been admitted or considered. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 16 Mar 1973 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200190