https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200179 Where the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act provides an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 62, writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass that remedy. The court noted that notices and extensions were granted for production of books and documents, but the assessee did not avail the opportunity, so there was no established violation of natural justice. Any grievance against the reassessment order, including alleged illegality, could be raised before the appellate authority. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed, with the petitioner relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:07:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200179 Where the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act provides an efficacious statutory appeal under Section 62, writ jurisdiction should not be used to bypass that remedy. The court noted that notices and extensions were granted for production of books and documents, but the assessee did not avail the opportunity, so there was no established violation of natural justice. Any grievance against the reassessment order, including alleged illegality, could be raised before the appellate authority. The writ petition was therefore held not maintainable and dismissed, with the petitioner relegated to the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Fri, 07 Apr 2017 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200179