<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (3) TMI 1649 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200181</link>
    <description>Detention of goods under a tax enforcement notice was based on a presumption that the goods were transported without the prescribed documents and that tax liability may arise. The court did not decide the alleged evasion on merits; instead, it required the petitioner to file an explanation with supporting materials and directed the respondent to consider those submissions and pass a reasoned order on merits within the fixed time. The order also contemplated determination of any one-time tax liability to enable release of the goods, while preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue statutory remedies against any adverse decision.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:07:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514299" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (3) TMI 1649 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200181</link>
      <description>Detention of goods under a tax enforcement notice was based on a presumption that the goods were transported without the prescribed documents and that tax liability may arise. The court did not decide the alleged evasion on merits; instead, it required the petitioner to file an explanation with supporting materials and directed the respondent to consider those submissions and pass a reasoned order on merits within the fixed time. The order also contemplated determination of any one-time tax liability to enable release of the goods, while preserving the petitioner&#039;s right to pursue statutory remedies against any adverse decision.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200181</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>