<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (12) TMI 1704 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200185</link>
    <description>Audit assessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act permitted additions for suppressed turnover where the assessment rested on specific delivery notes, the assessee&#039;s own admission that the books were not true and correct, and compounding of the offence with payment of tax and compounding fee. The High Court noted that such additions were supported by documentary material and admissions, not mere suspicion. It also clarified that the hearing requirement in section 24(1)(c) does not create a further right to verify alleged variations in the presence of the Assessing Authority; once notice and hearing are afforded, the assessee must place supporting material, and the best judgment power cannot be curtailed by such a procedural demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 10:07:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514295" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (12) TMI 1704 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200185</link>
      <description>Audit assessment under the Kerala Value Added Tax Act permitted additions for suppressed turnover where the assessment rested on specific delivery notes, the assessee&#039;s own admission that the books were not true and correct, and compounding of the offence with payment of tax and compounding fee. The High Court noted that such additions were supported by documentary material and admissions, not mere suspicion. It also clarified that the hearing requirement in section 24(1)(c) does not create a further right to verify alleged variations in the presence of the Assessing Authority; once notice and hearing are afforded, the assessee must place supporting material, and the best judgment power cannot be curtailed by such a procedural demand.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200185</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>