<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1153 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357450</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions on account of machinery hire charges and commission payments. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided substantial evidence to support the genuineness of the expenses claimed, including details of payments and compliance with tax regulations. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were both dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:14:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1153 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357450</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions to delete additions on account of machinery hire charges and commission payments. The Tribunal found that the assessee had provided substantial evidence to support the genuineness of the expenses claimed, including details of payments and compliance with tax regulations. The Revenue&#039;s appeal and the assessee&#039;s cross-objection were both dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357450</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>