https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357446 The court set aside the order withdrawing the No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued to the petitioner, ruling that the withdrawal was unjustified as there was no statutory prohibition against the initial issuance of the NOC. The court applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel, noting that the petitioner had relied on the NOC to its detriment. The court concluded that the directive from the Government of Mozambique did not have retrospective effect and advised the petitioner to seek clearance based on the NOC issued by the Chamber of Commerce of Mozambique - Beira. The writ petition was allowed with no costs. en-us Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 08 Sep 2018 12:45:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357446 The court set aside the order withdrawing the No Objection Certificate (NOC) issued to the petitioner, ruling that the withdrawal was unjustified as there was no statutory prohibition against the initial issuance of the NOC. The court applied the doctrine of promissory estoppel, noting that the petitioner had relied on the NOC to its detriment. The court concluded that the directive from the Government of Mozambique did not have retrospective effect and advised the petitioner to seek clearance based on the NOC issued by the Chamber of Commerce of Mozambique - Beira. The writ petition was allowed with no costs. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 21 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357446