<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1148 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357445</link>
    <description>Under Section 25(4) of the Customs Act, 1962, as it then stood, a customs notification became effective only if it was published in the Official Gazette and offered for sale on the date of issue. Because Notification No. 46/2015-Cus was shown to have been put on sale only on 21.09.2015, the mandatory conditions were not fully met and it could not justify enhanced customs duty. The earlier rate under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus therefore continued to apply.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Sep 2018 12:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514231" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1148 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357445</link>
      <description>Under Section 25(4) of the Customs Act, 1962, as it then stood, a customs notification became effective only if it was published in the Official Gazette and offered for sale on the date of issue. Because Notification No. 46/2015-Cus was shown to have been put on sale only on 21.09.2015, the mandatory conditions were not fully met and it could not justify enhanced customs duty. The earlier rate under Notification No. 12/2012-Cus therefore continued to apply.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357445</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>