https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357440 Duty paid in compliance with interim High Court orders pending proceedings is treated as payment under protest, so a separate formal protest is not required for refund purposes. The tribunal also found that the refund claims were filed within the prescribed six-month limitation period. On that basis, rejection of the refund claims for the seven Bills of Entry was not sustainable, and the refund could not be denied either for absence of protest or as time-barred. en-us Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:13:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357440 Duty paid in compliance with interim High Court orders pending proceedings is treated as payment under protest, so a separate formal protest is not required for refund purposes. The tribunal also found that the refund claims were filed within the prescribed six-month limitation period. On that basis, rejection of the refund claims for the seven Bills of Entry was not sustainable, and the refund could not be denied either for absence of protest or as time-barred. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 20 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357440