https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357439 The Tribunal set aside the order confiscating goods for mis-declaration, imposing a penalty, and confirming a differential duty demand. It ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the goods were not subject to the Standards of Weights and Measures Act as they were imported in CKD form without MRP. The Tribunal found no mis-declaration to avoid CVD payment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the importance of understanding the form of imported goods and relevant laws in determining duty liabilities. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 15 Mar 2019 14:27:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357439 The Tribunal set aside the order confiscating goods for mis-declaration, imposing a penalty, and confirming a differential duty demand. It ruled in favor of the appellant, stating that the goods were not subject to the Standards of Weights and Measures Act as they were imported in CKD form without MRP. The Tribunal found no mis-declaration to avoid CVD payment under Section 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, emphasizing the importance of understanding the form of imported goods and relevant laws in determining duty liabilities. Case-Laws Customs Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357439