https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357434 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the disqualification of directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 as premature and lacking factual foundation. It held that the provisions were constitutional and aimed at ensuring compliance. The petitioners were required to first approach the Registrar of Companies for resolution before seeking judicial intervention. The court emphasized the importance of following due process and presenting cases before the appropriate authorities for adjudication, ultimately deeming the petitions premature and not maintainable without proper factual basis and adherence to legal procedures. en-us Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:12:57 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357434 The court dismissed the writ petitions challenging the disqualification of directors under Section 164(2)(a) of the Companies Act, 2013 as premature and lacking factual foundation. It held that the provisions were constitutional and aimed at ensuring compliance. The petitioners were required to first approach the Registrar of Companies for resolution before seeking judicial intervention. The court emphasized the importance of following due process and presenting cases before the appropriate authorities for adjudication, ultimately deeming the petitions premature and not maintainable without proper factual basis and adherence to legal procedures. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 26 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357434