<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1133 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357430</link>
    <description>The appeals concerned whether further adjudication on the framed substantial questions of law was necessary when the matters had already been remitted for fresh decision, and whether the original adjudicating authority must consider Notifications No. 41/2007-ST and 45/2007-ST dated 06.10.2007 in the rehearing. The Rajasthan HC disposed of the appeals by directing the original authority to decide the matters afresh, taking both notifications into account and affording both parties an opportunity of hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 06:37:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514216" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1133 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357430</link>
      <description>The appeals concerned whether further adjudication on the framed substantial questions of law was necessary when the matters had already been remitted for fresh decision, and whether the original adjudicating authority must consider Notifications No. 41/2007-ST and 45/2007-ST dated 06.10.2007 in the rehearing. The Rajasthan HC disposed of the appeals by directing the original authority to decide the matters afresh, taking both notifications into account and affording both parties an opportunity of hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357430</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>