<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1124 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357421</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellant, as it was found that the denial of Cenvat credit on CVD paid for imported coal was based on the incorrect application of the relevant notifications. The appellant was held entitled to avail Cenvat credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the extended period of limitation could not be invoked due to the Revenue&#039;s misapplication of the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2022 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514207" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1124 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357421</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, granting consequential relief to the appellant, as it was found that the denial of Cenvat credit on CVD paid for imported coal was based on the incorrect application of the relevant notifications. The appellant was held entitled to avail Cenvat credit under Rule 3 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004, and the extended period of limitation could not be invoked due to the Revenue&#039;s misapplication of the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357421</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>