https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357418 Inconsistencies between the adjudicating authority's findings and the appellant's reply based on seized records created doubt over the quantity of clearances, valuation, and eligibility to SSI exemption, so these disputed factual issues were sent back for de novo examination. The portion of the demand that had already been dropped remained final because the Revenue had not challenged that part. The remand was therefore confined to fresh reconsideration of the contested issues, while the earlier relief granted in adjudication was left undisturbed. en-us Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:11:19 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357418 Inconsistencies between the adjudicating authority's findings and the appellant's reply based on seized records created doubt over the quantity of clearances, valuation, and eligibility to SSI exemption, so these disputed factual issues were sent back for de novo examination. The portion of the demand that had already been dropped remained final because the Revenue had not challenged that part. The remand was therefore confined to fresh reconsideration of the contested issues, while the earlier relief granted in adjudication was left undisturbed. Case-Laws Central Excise Wed, 28 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357418