<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1113 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357410</link>
    <description>The Tribunal analyzed the admissibility of Cenvat credit on imported finished goods, emphasizing compliance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. It concluded that if excise duty was paid during the clearance of imported goods, no further demand for recovery would exist. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of verifying duty payments on the sale of such goods to determine the admissibility of Cenvat credit accurately. Considering the specific circumstances and compliance with Rule 16, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for further verification, favoring the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514196" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1113 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357410</link>
      <description>The Tribunal analyzed the admissibility of Cenvat credit on imported finished goods, emphasizing compliance with Rule 16 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002. It concluded that if excise duty was paid during the clearance of imported goods, no further demand for recovery would exist. The Tribunal highlighted the significance of verifying duty payments on the sale of such goods to determine the admissibility of Cenvat credit accurately. Considering the specific circumstances and compliance with Rule 16, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the case for further verification, favoring the appellant&#039;s position.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357410</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>