<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1112 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357409</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow the refund of service tax paid by the respondent on behalf of the Chinchwad unit under Rule 10 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The transfer of Cenvat credit from the transferor unit to the transferee unit was deemed in accordance with Rule 10, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2018 07:11:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514195" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1112 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357409</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals)&#039; decision to allow the refund of service tax paid by the respondent on behalf of the Chinchwad unit under Rule 10 of the Cenvat Credit Rules. The transfer of Cenvat credit from the transferor unit to the transferee unit was deemed in accordance with Rule 10, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357409</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>