<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1972 (1) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200169</link>
    <description>Publication of a statutory notification issued under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, did not amount to contempt where the full notification, including the schedule of allegations, was published and the Commission&#039;s subject-matter was distinct from the pending criminal revisions. The Court reasoned that the notification was required to be published in the Official Gazette, the material supplied to the press was not selective or distorted, and the publication was not calculated to obstruct the due course of justice. Accordingly, the publication was held not to constitute contempt of Court, and relief was granted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 17:51:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1972 (1) TMI 106 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200169</link>
      <description>Publication of a statutory notification issued under the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952, did not amount to contempt where the full notification, including the schedule of allegations, was published and the Commission&#039;s subject-matter was distinct from the pending criminal revisions. The Court reasoned that the notification was required to be published in the Official Gazette, the material supplied to the press was not selective or distorted, and the publication was not calculated to obstruct the due course of justice. Accordingly, the publication was held not to constitute contempt of Court, and relief was granted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 1972 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200169</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>