https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200162 Where an effective statutory appeal is available against a Tribunal order, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be exercised to bypass that remedy. The Court reiterated that the appellate mechanism under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 provided the proper course, so the writ petition should not have been entertained. The order of the single Judge was therefore liable to be set aside, and the parties were required to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. en-us Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Mar 2018 15:25:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200162 Where an effective statutory appeal is available against a Tribunal order, writ jurisdiction should ordinarily not be exercised to bypass that remedy. The Court reiterated that the appellate mechanism under the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993 provided the proper course, so the writ petition should not have been entertained. The order of the single Judge was therefore liable to be set aside, and the parties were required to pursue the statutory appellate remedy. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Feb 2003 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200162