<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (9) TMI 98 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12402</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the competency of the Commissioner (Appeals) to entertain enhancement petitions and make necessary adjustments in assessments. The judgment clarified the expansive powers of the Appellate Commissioner in enhancing assessments, emphasizing that conformity with directions from lower-ranking officers does not restrict the appellate authority&#039;s jurisdiction to intervene in assessment matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:33:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51414" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (9) TMI 98 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12402</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Revenue, affirming the competency of the Commissioner (Appeals) to entertain enhancement petitions and make necessary adjustments in assessments. The judgment clarified the expansive powers of the Appellate Commissioner in enhancing assessments, emphasizing that conformity with directions from lower-ranking officers does not restrict the appellate authority&#039;s jurisdiction to intervene in assessment matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Sep 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12402</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>