<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1985 (2) TMI 304 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200152</link>
    <description>Civil court jurisdiction is determined from the plaint as a whole, not from the defence. Where the defendants denied title and tenancy and the plaintiffs proceeded against them as trespassers after revenue proceedings failed, the suit for possession and mesne profits lay in civil court. A mere reference to tenancy in the plaint did not make the matter exclusively triable by the revenue forum, so the bar under Sections 32 and 99 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act was not attracted on the pleaded case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 12:29:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514129" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1985 (2) TMI 304 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200152</link>
      <description>Civil court jurisdiction is determined from the plaint as a whole, not from the defence. Where the defendants denied title and tenancy and the plaintiffs proceeded against them as trespassers after revenue proceedings failed, the suit for possession and mesne profits lay in civil court. A mere reference to tenancy in the plaint did not make the matter exclusively triable by the revenue forum, so the bar under Sections 32 and 99 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act was not attracted on the pleaded case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Feb 1985 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200152</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>