<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (9) TMI 588 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200151</link>
    <description>The SC ruled that individuals whose seniority and promotions were determined by final judgments should remain unaffected by later interpretations, including those in Civil Appeal No. 4339 of 1995. The Court emphasized that statutory rules supersede administrative instructions but protected the rights of those previously favored by final judgments, dismissing objections based on delay.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Feb 2024 09:46:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514128" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (9) TMI 588 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200151</link>
      <description>The SC ruled that individuals whose seniority and promotions were determined by final judgments should remain unaffected by later interpretations, including those in Civil Appeal No. 4339 of 1995. The Court emphasized that statutory rules supersede administrative instructions but protected the rights of those previously favored by final judgments, dismissing objections based on delay.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200151</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>