https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200150 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is limited to discovery of new and important matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or another sufficient reason analogous to those grounds. New material must be relevant, previously unavailable despite due diligence, and capable of affecting the result; it cannot merely supplement an existing case or be used to reargue the matter. An apparent error must be obvious and not require elaborate reasoning. The court found that the documents were already in the petitioner's possession, the original decision rested on independent grounds, and the review application was only an attempt to introduce additional evidence after an adverse decision. The refusal to review was therefore sustained. en-us Thu, 21 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Mar 2018 11:37:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200150 Review jurisdiction under Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is limited to discovery of new and important matter, an error apparent on the face of the record, or another sufficient reason analogous to those grounds. New material must be relevant, previously unavailable despite due diligence, and capable of affecting the result; it cannot merely supplement an existing case or be used to reargue the matter. An apparent error must be obvious and not require elaborate reasoning. The court found that the documents were already in the petitioner's possession, the original decision rested on independent grounds, and the review application was only an attempt to introduce additional evidence after an adverse decision. The refusal to review was therefore sustained. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 21 Aug 1958 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200150