<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1099 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357396</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,62,67,130 made by the AO under &#039;Sales Promotion&#039; expenses for the assessment year 2012-13. The Tribunal found the expenses genuine and necessary for business purposes, not covered by the circular relied upon by the AO. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order, as the Tribunal noted similar claims were allowed in subsequent years.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 09:00:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514110" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1099 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357396</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition of Rs. 1,62,67,130 made by the AO under &#039;Sales Promotion&#039; expenses for the assessment year 2012-13. The Tribunal found the expenses genuine and necessary for business purposes, not covered by the circular relied upon by the AO. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s order, as the Tribunal noted similar claims were allowed in subsequent years.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357396</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>