<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1067 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357364</link>
    <description>Where a court constitutes a multi-agency SIT for a limited purpose, each constituent agency must act only within the assigned mandate and in a coordinated manner. The High Court reiterated that the investigation into ICRMS had to remain confined to the earlier orders and could not drift into unrelated matters or proceed independently in a fragmented way. It also directed that the petitioner, his family members and related business interests should not be subjected to coercive steps or investigative action in third-party disputes outside the SIT remit, and that the company under inquiry should not be stalled by extraneous measures.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2018 11:57:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514056" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1067 - PUNJAB &amp; HARYANA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357364</link>
      <description>Where a court constitutes a multi-agency SIT for a limited purpose, each constituent agency must act only within the assigned mandate and in a coordinated manner. The High Court reiterated that the investigation into ICRMS had to remain confined to the earlier orders and could not drift into unrelated matters or proceed independently in a fragmented way. It also directed that the petitioner, his family members and related business interests should not be subjected to coercive steps or investigative action in third-party disputes outside the SIT remit, and that the company under inquiry should not be stalled by extraneous measures.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>FEMA</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357364</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>