<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1056 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357353</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the appeals filed by the assessee, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence to support statements, especially when retracted. It reiterated that findings based on facts do not give rise to substantial questions of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:34:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514045" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1056 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357353</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to allow the appeals filed by the assessee, emphasizing the need for corroborative evidence to support statements, especially when retracted. It reiterated that findings based on facts do not give rise to substantial questions of law, leading to the dismissal of the appeals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>