https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357349 The appeal challenged the rejection of a balance amount of &8377; 11,84,580 in cenvat credit on various input services. The Member (Judicial) found merit in the appellant's arguments, allowing credits for Outdoor Catering Service, Employee Transportation Service, Hotel Charges, Travel Agent Service, and Construction Service based on legal precedents. The matter was remanded for further scrutiny on Employee Transportation Service and unexplained credit, emphasizing the importance of legal interpretations and detailed factual review. The case was disposed of by modifying the order and remanding it to the adjudicating authority for a thorough reassessment. en-us Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:34:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357349 The appeal challenged the rejection of a balance amount of &8377; 11,84,580 in cenvat credit on various input services. The Member (Judicial) found merit in the appellant's arguments, allowing credits for Outdoor Catering Service, Employee Transportation Service, Hotel Charges, Travel Agent Service, and Construction Service based on legal precedents. The matter was remanded for further scrutiny on Employee Transportation Service and unexplained credit, emphasizing the importance of legal interpretations and detailed factual review. The case was disposed of by modifying the order and remanding it to the adjudicating authority for a thorough reassessment. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 09 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357349