<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1045 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357342</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the main appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, against the denial of Cenvat Credit. It was found that the appellant had complied with necessary requirements during the relevant period, supported by judgments of the High Court of Gujarat. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with legal requirements and the validity of documents, setting aside the Impugned Order and allowing appeals against penalties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:34:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514034" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1045 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357342</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal filed by the main appellant, a manufacturer of excisable goods, against the denial of Cenvat Credit. It was found that the appellant had complied with necessary requirements during the relevant period, supported by judgments of the High Court of Gujarat. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of compliance with legal requirements and the validity of documents, setting aside the Impugned Order and allowing appeals against penalties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357342</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>