<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1044 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357341</link>
    <description>Export sales of manufactured goods were held outside the scope of the additional 1% levy under Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court reasoned that Section 3(4) applies only where a dealer, after availing the concessional purchase tax under Section 3(3), does not sell the manufactured goods and instead dispatches them outside the State in the specified modes; export sales do not fit that scheme. Explanation 3(a) to Section 2(n) treated the transaction as a sale for Act purposes, but Article 286 of the Constitution and Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act prevented indirect taxation of export transactions. The State&#039;s revisions were dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:35:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514033" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1044 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357341</link>
      <description>Export sales of manufactured goods were held outside the scope of the additional 1% levy under Section 3(4) of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959. The court reasoned that Section 3(4) applies only where a dealer, after availing the concessional purchase tax under Section 3(3), does not sell the manufactured goods and instead dispatches them outside the State in the specified modes; export sales do not fit that scheme. Explanation 3(a) to Section 2(n) treated the transaction as a sale for Act purposes, but Article 286 of the Constitution and Section 5(3) of the Central Sales Tax Act prevented indirect taxation of export transactions. The State&#039;s revisions were dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357341</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>