<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (6) TMI 1289 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200144</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to treat the income received as &quot;income from other sources&quot; instead of &quot;Income from House Property,&quot; considering past tribunal rulings and the nature of expenses and income classification. The decision addressed concerns of double taxation and instructed a reevaluation of income computation based on shared expenses and related deductions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2018 08:19:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=514020" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (6) TMI 1289 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200144</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, directing the Assessing Officer to treat the income received as &quot;income from other sources&quot; instead of &quot;Income from House Property,&quot; considering past tribunal rulings and the nature of expenses and income classification. The decision addressed concerns of double taxation and instructed a reevaluation of income computation based on shared expenses and related deductions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jun 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200144</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>