https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200133 Section 284N of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act referentially incorporated Part II of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, so the objection procedure in Section 5A, including the right to personal hearing, applied to acquisitions under Chapter XVI unless expressly excluded by that Chapter or Schedule C. Neither Schedule C nor Schedule B displaced that requirement, and the limited appeal under Schedule B was not a substitute for a statutory hearing before the Commissioner. Section 17(4) did not automatically exclude Section 5A. The stated conclusion is that personal hearing was mandatory and the acquisition order was invalid for non-compliance. en-us Thu, 29 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 18:24:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200133 Section 284N of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act referentially incorporated Part II of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, so the objection procedure in Section 5A, including the right to personal hearing, applied to acquisitions under Chapter XVI unless expressly excluded by that Chapter or Schedule C. Neither Schedule C nor Schedule B displaced that requirement, and the limited appeal under Schedule B was not a substitute for a statutory hearing before the Commissioner. Section 17(4) did not automatically exclude Section 5A. The stated conclusion is that personal hearing was mandatory and the acquisition order was invalid for non-compliance. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 29 Jul 1976 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200133