<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (6) TMI 25 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12387</link>
    <description>A residential property accepted as being used for business purposes in income-tax assessment could not be treated differently in wealth-tax proceedings. Because the property was found to be used for business purposes, its value was excluded from the assessee&#039;s net wealth under the applicable exemption, and the statutory exclusion applied. The referred question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:27:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51399" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (6) TMI 25 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12387</link>
      <description>A residential property accepted as being used for business purposes in income-tax assessment could not be treated differently in wealth-tax proceedings. Because the property was found to be used for business purposes, its value was excluded from the assessee&#039;s net wealth under the applicable exemption, and the statutory exclusion applied. The referred question was answered in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12387</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>