<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 76 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12386</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a goldsmith, allowing them to proceed with the declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The court emphasized compliance with the Scheme&#039;s provisions and the petitioner&#039;s fulfillment of necessary conditions. It interpreted key provisions of the Scheme, including the impact of pending writ petitions on eligibility. Despite challenges from the Revenue, the court admitted the writ petition and directed the authority to process the declaration promptly. The petitioner was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition, ensuring no coercive recovery actions during the declaration process.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:24:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 76 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12386</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, a goldsmith, allowing them to proceed with the declaration under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998. The court emphasized compliance with the Scheme&#039;s provisions and the petitioner&#039;s fulfillment of necessary conditions. It interpreted key provisions of the Scheme, including the impact of pending writ petitions on eligibility. Despite challenges from the Revenue, the court admitted the writ petition and directed the authority to process the declaration promptly. The petitioner was granted permission to withdraw the writ petition, ensuring no coercive recovery actions during the declaration process.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>