<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (7) TMI 75 - MADRAS High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12385</link>
    <description>Investment allowance under section 32A was confined to plant or machinery installed and used for the manufacture or production of an article or thing. A cinema projector only projects films and does not produce any article or thing, and an air-conditioning plant used for spectator comfort is likewise outside the provision. The assessee was therefore not entitled to investment allowance on either asset.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:22:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (7) TMI 75 - MADRAS High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12385</link>
      <description>Investment allowance under section 32A was confined to plant or machinery installed and used for the manufacture or production of an article or thing. A cinema projector only projects films and does not produce any article or thing, and an air-conditioning plant used for spectator comfort is likewise outside the provision. The assessee was therefore not entitled to investment allowance on either asset.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jul 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>