<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1999 (4) TMI 8 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12381</link>
    <description>Undisclosed sale proceeds were not taxable as the whole of income where there was no finding of any undisclosed investment in the goods sold outside the books; only the profit element embedded in the suppressed sales could be brought to tax. On that footing, the High Court held that no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, and the reference application was rightly rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 May 2025 09:19:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51393" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1999 (4) TMI 8 - GUJARAT High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12381</link>
      <description>Undisclosed sale proceeds were not taxable as the whole of income where there was no finding of any undisclosed investment in the goods sold outside the books; only the profit element embedded in the suppressed sales could be brought to tax. On that footing, the High Court held that no referable question of law arose from the Tribunal&#039;s order, and the reference application was rightly rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 1999 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>