<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1017 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357314</link>
    <description>The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was directed to examine an association&#039;s representation on GST levy over ongoing works contracts executed under earlier agreements, as the grievance concerned the effect of the post-GST regime on pre-existing contractual arrangements. The authority was required to consider the matter on merits, grant a personal hearing to the authorised representative, and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2025 16:16:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513886" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1017 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357314</link>
      <description>The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes was directed to examine an association&#039;s representation on GST levy over ongoing works contracts executed under earlier agreements, as the grievance concerned the effect of the post-GST regime on pre-existing contractual arrangements. The authority was required to consider the matter on merits, grant a personal hearing to the authorised representative, and pass a reasoned order in accordance with law within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357314</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>