<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1013 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357310</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal against the Order-in-Original 20 of 2011 within six months. The case involved the export of a restricted item without a license, leading to penalties on the CHA for negligence. The Tribunal, considering the CHA&#039;s negligence but deeming the penalty excessive, reduced it to Rs. 2,00,000 based on the Doctrine of Equity. The decision balanced negligence findings with equity principles, granting relief of Rs. 3,00,000 to the appellant, ensuring a fair outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Mar 2019 14:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513882" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1013 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357310</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court directed the Tribunal to hear the appeal against the Order-in-Original 20 of 2011 within six months. The case involved the export of a restricted item without a license, leading to penalties on the CHA for negligence. The Tribunal, considering the CHA&#039;s negligence but deeming the penalty excessive, reduced it to Rs. 2,00,000 based on the Doctrine of Equity. The decision balanced negligence findings with equity principles, granting relief of Rs. 3,00,000 to the appellant, ensuring a fair outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>