<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1003 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357300</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, modifying the order to allow credit on specific input services like catering charges but denying credit on insurance charges for vehicles and brokerage charges for accommodation. The judgment clarified the application of Rule 4 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and the nexus between input and output services in determining Cenvat Credit eligibility.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:32:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1003 - CESTAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357300</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, modifying the order to allow credit on specific input services like catering charges but denying credit on insurance charges for vehicles and brokerage charges for accommodation. The judgment clarified the application of Rule 4 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 and the nexus between input and output services in determining Cenvat Credit eligibility.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357300</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>