<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 997 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357294</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the Order-in-Original rejecting a refund claim for service tax paid on discounts passed to clients. The Revenue&#039;s argument that the tax burden was passed on to clients did not justify the rejection of the refund claim. The Tribunal found no fault in considering unjust enrichment and supported the decision to uphold the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:32:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 997 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357294</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) decision to set aside the Order-in-Original rejecting a refund claim for service tax paid on discounts passed to clients. The Revenue&#039;s argument that the tax burden was passed on to clients did not justify the rejection of the refund claim. The Tribunal found no fault in considering unjust enrichment and supported the decision to uphold the impugned order, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357294</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>