https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357293 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore, remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The Tribunal found that the impugned order lacked sustainability in law and directed a fresh order following principles of natural justice, based on a previous ruling with a similar issue. The decision emphasized the need for fairness and compliance with legal principles in addressing allegations of excess cenvat credit availed by the appellant. en-us Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 20 Mar 2018 13:50:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357293 The appeal was allowed by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Bangalore, remanding the case back to the adjudicating authority for reconsideration. The Tribunal found that the impugned order lacked sustainability in law and directed a fresh order following principles of natural justice, based on a previous ruling with a similar issue. The decision emphasized the need for fairness and compliance with legal principles in addressing allegations of excess cenvat credit availed by the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 11 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357293