https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357292 The Revenue appealed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing cenvat credit on various input services. The Department contended that these services did not meet the criteria of 'input services.' After considering arguments from both sides, the Judicial Member upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, concluding that the cenvat credit had been rightfully allowed. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the impugned order. en-us Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:32:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357292 The Revenue appealed against the Commissioner (Appeals) order allowing cenvat credit on various input services. The Department contended that these services did not meet the criteria of 'input services.' After considering arguments from both sides, the Judicial Member upheld the Commissioner (Appeals) order, concluding that the cenvat credit had been rightfully allowed. The appeal by the Revenue was dismissed, affirming the impugned order. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 10 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357292