<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 993 - Supreme Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357290</link>
    <description>The SC held that CENVAT credit for goods transport agency (GTA) services is available for transportation of final products &quot;from the place of removal&quot; up to the first point, whether depot or customer premises. The court interpreted Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, emphasizing that the expression &quot;from the place of removal&quot; must extend to a certain destination point. This interpretation was supported by subsequent amendment effective 01.04.2008 via notification 10/2008-CE(NT) dated 01.03.2008, which substituted &quot;from the place of removal&quot; with &quot;up to the place of removal,&quot; thereby restricting credit availability only up to the place of removal. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the decision favoring the assessee&#039;s entitlement to CENVAT credit for transportation services beyond the manufacturing premises to the first delivery point.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 10:30:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513862" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 993 - Supreme Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357290</link>
      <description>The SC held that CENVAT credit for goods transport agency (GTA) services is available for transportation of final products &quot;from the place of removal&quot; up to the first point, whether depot or customer premises. The court interpreted Rule 2(l) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, emphasizing that the expression &quot;from the place of removal&quot; must extend to a certain destination point. This interpretation was supported by subsequent amendment effective 01.04.2008 via notification 10/2008-CE(NT) dated 01.03.2008, which substituted &quot;from the place of removal&quot; with &quot;up to the place of removal,&quot; thereby restricting credit availability only up to the place of removal. The Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed, with the decision favoring the assessee&#039;s entitlement to CENVAT credit for transportation services beyond the manufacturing premises to the first delivery point.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jan 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357290</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>