<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 982 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357279</link>
    <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, concluding that the appellant, having paid excise duty on final products, was not required to reverse CENVAT credit again. The decision was based on the finding that the appellant&#039;s industry did not align with the industries specified in the Notification, despite utilizing solvent extraction processes. The judgment was pronounced on 07/02/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 08:31:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513851" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 982 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357279</link>
      <description>The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and allowed the appeals, concluding that the appellant, having paid excise duty on final products, was not required to reverse CENVAT credit again. The decision was based on the finding that the appellant&#039;s industry did not align with the industries specified in the Notification, despite utilizing solvent extraction processes. The judgment was pronounced on 07/02/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357279</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>