<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (8) TMI 1342 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200098</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the interim stay application conditions under the MVAT Act and Central Sales Tax Act. The Court found the conditions imposed to be just and fair, refusing to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s balancing of rights and equities in interim orders. Despite the Petitioner&#039;s claim of possessing proof of suppliers&#039; tax deposits, the Court emphasized the burden of proof lies with the Petitioner and that all remedies could be pursued in substantive proceedings before the First Appellate Authority. The Court dismissed the Writ Petition and denied an extension of time to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 07:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513839" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (8) TMI 1342 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200098</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision regarding the interim stay application conditions under the MVAT Act and Central Sales Tax Act. The Court found the conditions imposed to be just and fair, refusing to interfere with the Tribunal&#039;s balancing of rights and equities in interim orders. Despite the Petitioner&#039;s claim of possessing proof of suppliers&#039; tax deposits, the Court emphasized the burden of proof lies with the Petitioner and that all remedies could be pursued in substantive proceedings before the First Appellate Authority. The Court dismissed the Writ Petition and denied an extension of time to comply with the Tribunal&#039;s order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200098</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>