<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2016 (5) TMI 1431 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200102</link>
    <description>The court upheld the monetary limits set by the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs for filing appeals, dismissing the appeal due to the amount being below the prescribed limit. It allowed for the examination of substantial legal questions in future proceedings if necessary. The judgment emphasized the retrospective application of the circular&#039;s monetary limits to pending appeals in High Courts and CESTAT, aiming to reduce litigation and align with directives from the Central Board of Direct Tax.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Mar 2018 07:12:07 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2016 (5) TMI 1431 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200102</link>
      <description>The court upheld the monetary limits set by the Central Board of Excise &amp;amp; Customs for filing appeals, dismissing the appeal due to the amount being below the prescribed limit. It allowed for the examination of substantial legal questions in future proceedings if necessary. The judgment emphasized the retrospective application of the circular&#039;s monetary limits to pending appeals in High Courts and CESTAT, aiming to reduce litigation and align with directives from the Central Board of Direct Tax.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2016 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=200102</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>