<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2002 (5) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12371</link>
    <description>Royalty was treated as a tax-like compulsory exaction for purposes of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, following the settled understanding drawn from India Cement Ltd. and later decisions. On that basis, unpaid royalty liability fell within the statutory bar and was not deductible until actually paid. The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 15:07:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=51383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2002 (5) TMI 21 - RAJASTHAN High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12371</link>
      <description>Royalty was treated as a tax-like compulsory exaction for purposes of section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, following the settled understanding drawn from India Cement Ltd. and later decisions. On that basis, unpaid royalty liability fell within the statutory bar and was not deductible until actually paid. The reference was answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2002 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=12371</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>