<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 945 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357242</link>
    <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 2,11,086/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, citing lack of specificity in the notice, absence of recorded satisfaction in the assessment order, and procedural lapses violating natural justice principles. The appeal by the Assessee was allowed, with the Tribunal&#039;s decision pronounced on 16/03/2018.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2018 08:46:16 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=513727" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 945 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357242</link>
      <description>The Tribunal canceled the penalty of Rs. 2,11,086/- imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, citing lack of specificity in the notice, absence of recorded satisfaction in the assessment order, and procedural lapses violating natural justice principles. The appeal by the Assessee was allowed, with the Tribunal&#039;s decision pronounced on 16/03/2018.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=357242</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>